It’s been said that “In focus = porn; out of focus = art.” On that basis, most, if not all, of the sonograms that I’ve seen wouldn’t be considered porn. As art, they just might have been masterpieces, depending on who you asked.
No, because fetuses are only classified as children in “celebrate the culture of life by instigating the maximum possible amount of death by poverty, disease and war” world, not in the real world.
Yes, sonograms are fetus porn. Especially when you can see the penis flapping around in there!!! Ewwwwwwwwwwww!!!!! That is why I can never have a baby! Nope! No penises shall ever grow inside of me! Nope nope nope!!
As far as “nursing” a six year old, that is absolutely disgusting and I find it hard to believe that any actual nutrition is occurring. I’ve heard mother’s say it is “bonding” but I think those women have padded rooms and jackets with buckles in the back waiting for them.
It’s been said that “In focus = porn; out of focus = art.” On that basis, most, if not all, of the sonograms that I’ve seen wouldn’t be considered porn. As art, they just might have been masterpieces, depending on who you asked.
Rt
No, because fetuses are only classified as children in “celebrate the culture of life by instigating the maximum possible amount of death by poverty, disease and war” world, not in the real world.
Next question: Are sonograms fetus porn? Discuss.
Hmmmmm… that’s a tough one.
Along the same lines, is it sexual abuse if a mother is still breastfeeding her 6-year-old child?
Yes, sonograms are fetus porn. Especially when you can see the penis flapping around in there!!! Ewwwwwwwwwwww!!!!! That is why I can never have a baby! Nope! No penises shall ever grow inside of me! Nope nope nope!!
As far as “nursing” a six year old, that is absolutely disgusting and I find it hard to believe that any actual nutrition is occurring. I’ve heard mother’s say it is “bonding” but I think those women have padded rooms and jackets with buckles in the back waiting for them.
Update